Tag Archives: New York Times

Apple’s Human Cost

For those of you who haven’t heard, the tech giant was in some pretty hot water this week as a result of a scathing article in the New York Times that highlighted Apple’s involvement in deplorable worker conditions overseas. It’s lengthy, but worth a read:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?pagewanted=1

I’ve seen quite a few Facebook posts regarding this article over the past couple of days so decided to dive into Sysomos to gather some insight into the Social Media impact. Surprisingly, mentions of the article/incident accounted for only 2% of Apple’s overall chatter. Pretty tiny. The only shift that could be seen was neutral/negative sentiment shifting from 45% to 66% vs. previous weeks.

What does this tell us? Well, when you’re a company as big as Apple, even major stories like this can be eclipsed by general product chatter and fanboy reviews. Goes to show (depending on the brand involved), not everything has the impact or share-ability we assume it will in social media

 

 

Online privacy and the FTC

Today, the FTC in the US backed a plan for a “do not track” option similiar to the “do not call” for telemarketers. A couple of good longer articles; NYT and Salon. This is a tough one because the technology that allows for tracking and Non PII profiling is the same that makes the web easier to use and more relevant to our interests. Furthermore does this tip the scales in the favour of advertising within the walled gardens like Facebook where the targeting options do not rely on cookies or perisistant Flash objects? Plus is seeing an ad that targets you based on a profile that tramautic? Well it could be but I haven’t seen one yet. If you have – please send me the example as a screen shot.

Certainly the method for opting out could be made a lot simpler for people to use. In the same vein however why shouldn’t consumers have the option to manage the degree they share their info? If I was in the market for a car – why wouldn’t I want manufacturers to know that so they may show me their best stuff and of course I would not be missing anything if I never had to see another shampoo ad but that’s just my personal choice. A blanket in-or-out do not track list cannot manage those preferences.

At one point complaints about email SPAM were all the rage. Legislation came in about optin but my email addresses is still SPAMMED regularly with one notable exception; Facebook. So that brings me to asking is legislation really the best answer we have to managing our privacy?

Real time bidding explained – NYT

Ed Montes quoted in the NYT – worth reading to show where we are going.

U of T and the shadowy world of online spying

It is exciting to see a client; U of T, making news and getting world class press. They announced March 29 that a research team had uncovered an online spying cabability that is tracking postings about China. The story of course showed up in the Globe and Mail and The Star but also the New York Times and now I see it in The Economist.

I think it’s great because it ties in perfectly with their brand positioning. Their tagline is “Canada’s answers to the world’s problems” and the campaign is all about the research they have been doing. The best definition of a strong brand I have ever heard is ” a promise kept” and this certainly fits.

Electoral college map

The New York Times has this fancy map showing what states are in what camp for the upcoming US election. Now if they could only correlate the changes in the polling over time with news events such as the SNL skits – that would be really cool.

After the US Obama McCain debate

The New York Times did something very unusual in it’s coverage of the second presidential debate. The debate has ended and I can hear CNN on the tv upstairs turning it over to their army of talking heads with only 30 seconds to make their point and move on the next one. Meanwhile downstairs I was watching the debate on NYT’s streaming live video while clearing up some emails. The NYT’s coverage just lets the cameras roll for half an hour after the debate has ended. They pan and cut from camera to camera now and then, no audio just the buzz of the live audience but the interesting thing they are showing is that McCain has left the room, he is gone within minutes, no interest in the 100 or so people in the audience who were posing him questions earlier. Obama however looks around and sees the opportunity at hand. He and Michelle start and one end and work their way through the seats to meet each and every one of the people. You can see the people sitting on the McCain side of the stage eagerly awaiting their turn, which eventually comes. By the 15 minute mark people are out of their seats and it has turned into a mini- Obama rally. No audience member has left; they are now all requesting autographs, taking pictures of themselves and eventually settle down into one big group shot with Obama and Michelle at the center. That continues on till nearly half an hour post debate. No doubt – Obama wins the audience by a landslide.

From an online media perspective it shows how “newspapers” now are competing against tv’s for eyeballs for live events. But also it shows how the medium changes the message. CNN has to sell ad time, it has to push it’s message against the audience. Perhaps the NYT hasn’t seized on ad selling of the video property or maybe it’s journalists are ready to appear as talking heads? Maybe it will never will and online video will continue to show quite different views of the same event.

More about Scrabulous

Interesting story on the history of Scrabulous and what’s going on with game makers. From the New York Times.